Related Posts
More Posts
How to move from Barclays India to Barclays UK?
Is it a red flag if they’re an associate?
What health/pharma agencies are in SF?
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.







Most organizations recruiter reviews every application. The ATS simply is a file keeper not a bot.
The ATS is for moving the candidate through the application process. We (I) always review candidates resumes. The resume is a summary or breakdown of the candidates work and/or job experiences.
I get it. Job searching is frustrating. I wish I could school you on the thousand and one ways you’re wrong about it being the ATS robot reading and eliminating your résumé but ain’t nobody got time for that. RE entry level roles um, It’s their business so they get to decide what an entry-level role is in their environment. Hiring people with zero experience takes a lot of babysitting and not all companies are set up to dedicate the resources necessary to hold your hand you while you take months to learn how to do the job they’re literally paying you to do. What if the job was “airline pilot entry level zero years experience, education only required” you getting on that plane? or would you preferred if they had two years of experience?
The current ratio of applications to hires is hundreds::one. Firms are looking for a near perfect match or a known referral in order to proceed through a process.
0-2 years is definitely “entry level” in most cases.
I agree they are looking for the perfect match. Unfortunately, there are some companies that are missing out fast learners, work ethic etc , for the perfect match that will leave the company as soon as they find a better offer.
I think the confusion is with the term ATS. I have never seen an ATS that reads and declines or accepts a resume. That’s a myth. Recruiters spend hours pouring over resumes. The ATS applicant tracking system does just that. It tracks the applicant. It’s an electronic file folder.
We get so many application.
Just today I open 5 new mid to senior roles and in lest that 4 hours I got 25+ application per roles.
Our deadline are short and clients are looking for a unicorn candidates. Yes we call and no matter what a resume say we will ask the question even if we read the resume just to see where are the lies.
2 years is an entry level position.
Tracking all, in the post I said more than 2 years is not entry level.
Just so we are clear, I never said ATS systems are horrible, I just said it would be nice if recruiters reviewed them more. Obviously some professions should be concerned with entry level and clearly those careers would still require you to test your skills. I mean even in the Army we have flight test, SIFT test etc, but even then if they have THE credentials, you are not necessarily entry level, and you will still get trained according to the standard. Also personally, I'm not looking to be babysat or micromanaged. I'm just saying previous job experience should not be overlooked. The roles of leadership/ servant leadership/ supervisor/ manager are often similar in that you take care of people, and take care of business. That's not entry level.
Subject Expert
When we are getting hundreds of resumes for every job, we are going to pick the people that are the best suited. If I can hire someone who already knows how to do the job, I'm going to do that over someone that has to be trained. In a different economy that might be different.
I've seen so many jobs listing 5+ years of everything under the sun and still ENTRY LEVEL
Coach
In THEIR environment that is entry level. I think new grads are confused about the role of employer it’s not your university. Their job is not to train you to do the work. Their job is to hire you and pay you for knowledge to get the job done McDonald’s entry level is different then a global software companies, entry-level position entry-level in that environment might very well be someone for five years of experience