Related Posts
Before there was Silicon Valley 📺, before there was Bullshit Jobs 📖, before there was Office Space🎞️...
There was Processed World - a terrific little anticapitalist magazine skewering the terrible bosses and petty oppressive workplaces with humor and a clear heart. La plus ca change... today's computers are better, the bosses, however...
http://www.processedworld.com/History/history.html

Do socialists actually think talk like this from Kamala Harris is actually helpful? That you need an 'equity' approach whereby people with low income or of color are helped first post catastrophe.
It's funny because I sort of agree implicitly, but Harris's phrasing makes me less supportive of it.
If I were in her shoes and I were asked, I'd say, we will help people in need, and those whose need is most dire will be a priority. In practice, that means the poor are higher priority, of course.
https://mobile.twitter.com/RyanAFournier/status/1575955899012694016
Looks like we’re now back to $100k
Any idea where is Uday Odedra joining??
Are you a diverse person? Are you an ally to DEI?
I’d love to speak with you for 10-20 mins about my LLC and Nonprofit and the work that I’ve been looking to do as it relates to education and diversity.
Please feel free to view the video on the homepage of my website:
https://www.bridginglegaciesacrosscampuses.org/mission
Should this be of interest to you, please feel free to use this link below to set up a meeting:
https://calendly.com/jleebridgingandbuilding/30-minute-meeting-over-the-phone
Additional Posts in Leadership
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.





I feel the same. Our performance reviews feel like a checkbox exercise. My best experience was when reviews were tied to ongoing feedback, not just a once-a-year scramble. Regular check-ins and clear, measurable goals make a huge difference. Have you tried pushing for a more continuous feedback model?
If employees are only hearing about their performance at year end (or twice a year at most), the system will never work correctly. You should be giving your team continuous, ongoing feedback. They should never hear negative feedback for the first time in an annual or mid-year review.
Totally feel this. Ours used to be just like that—more of a formality than anything helpful. What made a big difference was moving to quarterly check-ins instead of annual reviews. We keep it casual but structured, and it’s actually opened the door for more honest, real-time coaching.
I do ongoing reviews with all my directors and expect the same out of them and their direct reports. But our firm reviews are just atrocious. They are check the box and mean absolutely nothing when it comes bonus time. I’ve tried to get our president to change to actual helpful reviews but it’s just laziness. They don’t want to put the time into helpful reviews
Yeah, we don't do performance reviews at all. We offer just in time feedback (positive and negative), and have a process bad performers go through that is much more formalized and lawsuit-proof.