Related Posts
Bonus for EY S&O?
Additional Posts in Human Resources
Hi everyone! I hope you’re all doing well and staying safe during the holiday season. I wanted to take a moment to highlight a role that I’m hiring for - Sr. Learning & Talent Development Partner. If you’re interested, I’ve added to the Fishbowl jobs board - https://joinfishbowl.com/job_rpc2p5vsvq. Feel free to reach out directly if you’d like to chat. :)
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.





To be honest, it's all of the above. Leadership generally wants HR to do more with less, candidates mass apply and often ghost because it's a numbers game on their side.
I'm old enough to remember recruiting before the internet ruined everything. Lol it's definitely a blessing and a curse...
would love to learn more about your insights. I have a questionnaire below on the study I am doing for application and hiring research: https://forms.office.com/r/bXb2DjaNKN
I guess its application volume as we cant give our 100% in so much of pressure.
would love to learn more about your insights. I have a questionnaire below on the study I am doing for application and hiring research: https://forms.office.com/r/bXb2DjaNKN
Applicant tracking/AI is what is wrong with the recruiting process. I don't advocate going back to the days of posting in the newspaper want ads, but ever since the beginning of internet recruiting, it's been on a downward spiral.
First, recruiters posted jobs on every site known to man, got so many resumes all at once that they were unable to view them all.
Then came ATS/AI and recruiters set the criteria so that most candidates were screened out and they complained that there was a candidate shortage.
Candidates knew that they were being screened by ATS/A so they apply using AI resumes, and recruiters complain that all the resumes look alike.
Recruiters, you have created this problem. You want only the resumes that are a perfect match for the position without having to work to find them. Relying completely on AI to find candidates neither works for the company nor the candidate, Some of my best hires have been candidates that were not perfect matches, but had qualities that attracted my attention, or maybe they were good candidates for another role in the company.
As a candidate myself, I am usually not looking for exactly the same thing I've done before. I am looking to grow, so my resume is most likely not an exact match. Why would I want a new job doing exactly what I do now?
Would love to learn more about your insights. I am conducting a study on this and would greatly appreciate if you can share your thoughts on this: https://forms.office.com/r/bXb2DjaNKN
IMO, an accurate job description will affect all things you have listed.
Would love to learn more about your insights. I am conducting a study on this and would greatly appreciate if you can share your thoughts on this: https://forms.office.com/r/bXb2DjaNKN
AI has ruined the entire process, on both sides. Workday and other platforms has made hiring managers and entry level recruiters too reliant on automated sorting and filters, and they are not looking hard enough at related skills and possible progression/growth into an idea candidate. Candidates using AI to write their resumes makes everyone look the same, and has made recruiters and hiring managers even more skeptical and less trusting of what appears on paper in terms of skills.
Would love to learn more about your insights. I am conducting a study on this and would greatly appreciate if you can share your thoughts on this: https://forms.office.com/r/bXb2DjaNKN
Pro
I think communication is still one of the biggest issues. I have seen strong candidates disengage because of slow timelines, poor updates, or unclear expectations.
Would love to learn more about your insights. I am conducting a study on this and would greatly appreciate if you can share your thoughts on this: https://forms.office.com/r/bXb2DjaNKN
wouldlovetohearyourthoughts:https://forms.office.com/r/bXb2DjaNKN