Related Posts
How bout that Robinhood update
Additional Posts in Human Resources
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
How bout that Robinhood update
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

Just remember the realities: not all companies are large; not all companies have accountability mechanisms that leadership must answer to; and under the leadership of aggressive C-suite actors, they can (and do) easily formulate plans without the input of HR.
Rather, those leaders bypass HR and instead consult their general counsel as to the overall legality of proposed actions.
HR is left to interpret and justify the actions already underway, to the remaining stakeholders. And, do damage control.
I’ve seen it firsthand.
Agreed
Chief
Where I am, HR is "at the table" and definitely a strategic partner.
Totaly agreed
I have seen both, but often it leans more support than strategic. If decisions are made before HR is involved, it limits real impact. I think true partnership only happens when HR is included early.
True