Related Posts
Hello fellow Fishes I have an offer from persistent. Need some clarity on same. I want to know the grade system in persistent. What does 7.1 mean? Is 7.1 a right fit for an total experience of 10+ years? What is the appropriate CTC for an architect designation? I want to know if I am getting it as per experience.
Persistent Systems Persistent Systems Limited
cisco or morgan stanley?
What is project specific BGC in TCS?
More Posts
Whatever you do don’t turn on networking...
Referral alert! CGI
👋 Hello Fishbowl Family,
To view all open positions, visit CGI Careers: https://bit.ly/3xw9yIR
Interested candidates can DM or send a mail with updated cv: bikash.jena@cgi.com for referral.
You can also fill this form: https://lnkd.in/gPjB4aWW
Important :
1) Referral != Shortlisting/Interview
2) It takes time to refer, please be patient as I will go through all the referral requests.
All the best!
Hi not from Indonesia but speak the language
Additional Posts in The Actuarial Fish Pond
How’s everyone doing?
Any Aon pension actuaries who could help my friend understand the hierarchy of titles? Let’s say my friend has 10 years of experience, FSA and EA credentials, was a consistently high performer over his career, what would his expected title be at Aon within the core retirement actuarial business? Thanks in advance.
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.




EY has a really strong insurance practice and the actuaries get to support a far wider range of projects than at WTW because of the wider firm. I did my grad scheme at TW (as it was then) and I would recommend EY over WTW.
Willis Towers Watson has a reputation for specialising in Insurance while EY is more generalist. If you are sure about the path you’re taking, WTW. If you are open to exploring other areas outside actuary, then EY.
Specialising in an area is much better for growth and salary, while if you are unsure then EY.
If you’re graduating this summer and have not accepted a full time offer, it could be a moot point based on opportunities available.
If I’m understanding right that it’s non-actuarial at EY you won’t be in the actuarial department. You won’t end up working with them/doing any actuarial work. So I’d recommend wtw but if I misread that I think EY actuarial dept > wtw actuarial dept
Kind of weird that SC1 is suggesting WTW is mostly insurance, I would go with the opposing view that it’s mostly retirement for actuaries.