Related Posts
Hi Capgemini people, Till 15th November we have to declare our vaccination status so that they can plan back to office for the employees who are fully vaccinated or having report of not having covid. I am Fully vaccinated but if I declare that I am partially vaccinated will they get to know my bluff? Actually I am not much interested to go back to office as of now may be in february it will be fine for me
Capgemini
Has your company made vaccine mandatory?
*#AThousandThankYous to the front line workers*
Our nation saw a disheartening surge in covid cases. Amidst these tough and painful times, the doctors, nurses, and hospital staff continue to work day in and day out for our safety, our lives.
Calling you to join hands, as we raise funds to show them a token of gratitude with a small care package.
A ray of light to those who deserve #AThousandThankYous 🙏🏻
Please donate at - bit.ly/aThousandThankYous
More Posts
Please evaluate this initial offer for Apple ICT3. I think I was low balled, but I want to take more opinions. Currently Sr. MTS at VMware, received Apple ICT3. I was expecting to get to ICT4 but seems like team thinks upper end of ICT3 is more apt. Also, I think it is because I don’t have any counter offers yet.
Received offer
Base: 185k
Sign on: 40k
RSU: 160k/4 years (Here is where I think it is low)
Location: Cupertino,CA
Current TC
229k
YOE: 3.5 years US / 6.5 overall(similar roles)
How did we do!?

Wow, so no more free lunches…what a joke
Additional Posts in Personal Injury Lawyers
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.




Client (without my knowledge) contacted the doctors and got those first providers to change the records to include mention of work injury. The defendant has seen the old records im fairly certain (or I’d have to disclose them anyways i suppose). The new records don’t seem to say “edited.” Nervous that this update is worse than explaining away the absence of mention of the injury. Thoughts?
Bowl Leader
I have had this happen but I think only once. I settled the case but it’s not a good look. Your client of course can be subject to cross. The way to handle may be to get the doc to admit the error. If the case goes to trial I’d probably get the bad fact out of the way on direct with a quick explanation
I have not seen this. But it sounds like a credibility issue and not dispositive. Hopefully not an issue for SJ, but not a good look.