Related Posts
More Posts
Best kitchen knife set under $600?
Additional Posts in Big Law
Don’t make me go back to the office… 😩😩😩

Leaving after one year to another biglaw firm?
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.




But on the flip side, why would someone give you a positive review if you performed poorly? A review is an assessment, not a way for an understaffed group to lure associates to their cases. In my experience, successful practice groups think long-term, and are more focused on slowly but surely building a core of motivated and talented associates, not just pulling in any and all associates with time.
A5, I’ve never heard of anything close to an “instruction,” but the partners and senior associates with a practice group obvious talk about the performance of the juniors, and in my experience tend to coalesce around shared impressions.
Before they can hire someone good, they have to get rid of you first
Isn't there going to. be a lull then as opposed to hiring right now before getting rid of someone and to get rid of someone you have to give them website time anyways
Bold strategy to respond to a bad review by further reducing your performance. I’m sure they will totally give you a better review next time to get you to start taking their matters seriously again.
For a lot of folks, it’s not that the reviews are fake or a way to motivate. They’re just angry all the time (usually for reasons beyond the control of their coworkers). That poisons their interactions globally.
My point isn’t that reviews should be used as either a negative or positive motivator, or some other kind of means to a long-term end. It’s just that (often times) this is a short term solution to something else. It’s not done with intentionality. The guy going through the rough divorce (and taking it out on everyone around him) or the NEP who’s quickly realizing this year is their last chance to get equity & has started shouting at people or the midlevel who’s in over their head re: substance and throwing juniors under the bus to cover? They’re not thinking. They’re lashing out. That can come out via reviews or interactions or whatever.
Mentor
A negative review is also a management strategy to pay you less—by lowering your bonus, holding you back a year, or simply demoralizing you so you don’t fight for origination credit or higher-value assignments or other career-enhancing growth opportunities.
This is likely firm specific. You see all reviews at my firm.
Mentor
Every employer thinks it’s easier to just start from scratch if they don’t like an employee, instead of taking the time to rebuild that underperforming employee. Maybe that’s true if it really is the employee 100% at fault but that almost always is not the case.
If someone merited a negative written review, I am not going to miss having them staffed on my cases.
I am in an understaffed practice group. Multiple midlevels and seniors in my group gave a junior bad reviews. We've been working with this junior for over a year now, with significant time trying to mentor them, give clear instructions and feedback including constructive criticism. Notably, significantly more time and mentoring than other juniors have received because this junior has been struggling so much. A year later, none of the feedback has been incorporated and it is literally better for us to not have this junior on our teams and be even more understaffed than to work with them. No one wants to tank this junior's career, but also no one wants to work with them because they are a negative value add even a year later.