Related Posts
Anyone know the recruiters for Twitter?
McKinsey & Company Hi everyone. Hope all is well.
Recently took the McKinsey & Company game (not sure if I have an interview yet but preparing nonetheless). It’s an entry level business analyst position and an entry level digital position and was wondering if anyone wanted to case prep with me. I’m willing to work on anyones time zone. (I’m located in Sydney, Australia).
Rising Star
Hi Fishes, I am considering a Senior Engineer role with Alteryx (previously Hyper Anna) Sydney. If it's not too much trouble, I was hoping if anyone here could share their experience of working at Alteryx Sydney in terms of Culture, work life balance, politics, work pressure, people, Leadership and product. Thanks.
Bowl Leader
More Posts
Does McCann have a bowl??
Additional Posts in Life Sciences Consulting
Which firms (if any) shut down for the holidays?
CRO companies as an exit? Yes or no?
How much do principals at IQVIA make?
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Coach
SM at LEK is 2-3 years til partner - people usually spend 1 year at SM and then 1 year at principal before making partner.
I would take LEK over ZS - Better comp, nearly pure strat cases (in LS), brand name, decent hours (average 55-60 for LS) - really no downside.
Coach
Sort of. We’re a smaller firm, so there’s less choice. That being said, 1) you can align yourself officially or unofficially to a sector pretty early, and 2) you can build relationships with partners / managers and get on the cases you want relatively early as well. Partners and managers have a ton of control over team selection, within reason (the people they want to staff need to be available obviously).
I’d go with LEK
AP at ZS is 2 to 3 years from equity partner. It's a senior role tested like a member of our leadership.
The hardest part here would be figuring out where you are going to drive impact and building a team.
I don't know LEKs levels, but are you sure that typical for SM is full equity partnership within a few years?
How does the pay compare? I assume LEK pays more.
With regards to exits, LEK would be better too.
I would try to understand which has a better probability to get to the partnership. They are probably close too. In either scenario, partnership is not handed easily. Good luck.
No comparison on comp. Lek will be higher in both the short and long term.
Exits will be much better here too, in case you don’t make partner. I’ve worked at both LEK and ZS.
Projects are much more interesting and impactful at LEK as well. You’ll spend more of your time on delivery of bigger projects here vs trying to sell small ones at ZS. Part of the answer also depends on how content focused you want to be.
ZS AP to P conversion is high for homegrown APs. I saw much lower rates for lateral APs though. Don’t know how to compare LEK to ZS on partnership likelihood; not saying it’s easier here either.