Related Posts
1. What are the hierarchy leveles in ZS Associates (software development). ZS folks , kindly help me on the same. I am having 4 years of experience, what hierarchy band can i expect?
2. How much percentage is variable component in ZS? I come from ACN which has 21% vp component.
Is vp paid fully?
3. Also, how is wlb in zs, Haven't heard quite good abt zs wlb..
ZS Associates
Hi Fishies,
Looking for any reviews/suggestions regarding Pubmatic. Most important is the tech stack and learning aspects.
Big data technologies(Scala-Spark etc) and Java.
Also in discussion with Impetus and Autodesk (via third party i.e. Applicantz).
CTC is not a concern right now as what they are offering is enough for me right now.
Any suggestions would be helpful
Publicis Sapient Tata Consultancy Autodesk Amex Infosys Impetus Wipro LTI Information Technology Citi Virtusa Accenture
Any attorneys do title? Is it worth it?
More Posts
Made Cacio butter

Additional Posts in Big Law
Dickinson Wright salary scale?
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.



1. I’m risk averse.
Enthusiast
In my opinion- most people I know who were sold a boutique firms realized they have been scammed. Like many people said, not enough data but BL salary with 1900 hours is an easy choice.
🎯
Subject Expert
1900 isn't that bad imo, so would rather have that, but if I had some high level numbers for 2, I could be convinced. Not enough data.
1. I'm trying to coast and collect til I can have my own firm.
Depends whether you’re ready to be partner and build your own book of business, particularly given the boutique model is “eat what you kill”.
Agree that not enough data is given with your question, as we don’t know your goals or whether you have a decent book (or good prospects for building one). Depending on your practice area, consider the new model firms where there’s no “equity” but you keep 80% on your own collections plus about 30% on others’ work on your own clients. Then you avoid buy-in, eternal fight for more units and risk/liability of partnership with boutique partners (whose downsides you won’t really know til you’re already semi-stuck with them). If you stick with the formula-based, non-equity model, you can control your hours and — depending on your practice and ability to learn how to win within this model — your compensation.
That being said, probably over 90% of lawyers are so risk-averse, they cannot bring themselves to make this leap. It’s too bad, as if you believe in your work quality and that it stacks up fine against insanely expensive comparable work from BigLaw, you can do great in eat-what-you-kill. At my firm, we just did the numbers and the women make more than the men on average.
Subject Expert
I think equity partner is overrated. You could well end up making less money and working more plus all the stress of having to bring in your own work. If you aren’t that concerned about the title/power within the firm, making good money with a steady workflow as a NEP/counsel is a decent gig imo.
Update: the big law firm is paying me well below market bc I got mommy tracked (210k base so way below and they’ll continue this path). The boutique option would actually pay more bc the revenue share is based on collections not originations so I could bill 100 hours a month and make more than the big law option. My book is small but growing and the boutique partners have multiple matters they want to push to me. Any changes to the above answers on these bases?