Related Posts
More Posts
Anyone want to hit up beltline tonight??
Does Chicago have a secret sex society ?
Hey guys. I have been applying to Amex for the past 1 year. Tried applying on the portal, through referrals and even hr consultants reached me regarding the roles since I have a relevant profile. But not once have I been shortlisted or called for an interview. What could be the problem?
PS: I have gotten calls from every other company for the same profile but not amex. Can't be a problem with the profile. Seems something dicey which I'm not aware of.American Express
How does pwc’s wealth builder plan work ?
Additional Posts in Big Law
How often do you drink? To what extent?
Thoughts on K&L Gates corporate department?
How would you define great communication?
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.




Subject Expert
I mean it is part of the job. Bringing costs in-house to reduce overall legal spend is a huge part of why in-house counsel get hired, does not surprise me that’s on a resume. When biglaw sends in a bill that’s $100k higher than the business people expected, it falls on the in-house lawyer to either justify it or negotiate it down. There’s always complicated extra nuances in the law and in-house counsel have to decide if those are worth the extra money of investigating or not worth it given the overall context of the matter. As outside counsel you’re providing a service for money, your job (and incentive) is to sell more services, their job is to decide whether that’s a value add proposition for their company. Just like when you go to BestBuy or wherever they try and upsell you on their extended warranties and geek squad subscription etc and you don’t always jump up and down in joy to hand over your limited money even though getting insurance in case of worst case scenarios might be a good idea. Sounds like these folks are just doing their jobs.
(This is part of why I get frustrated with people’s endless rose-colored glasses about going in-house… there’s some very different stresses.)
Ya, C1. You just sent a shiver down my spine re the rose colored glasses of in-house
Subject Expert
I wouldn’t say they hate biglaw but anyone who’s spent any meaningful time there knows it’s far from a model of efficiency. They believe (with more than a little support) that biglaw firms do an awful lot of unnecessary work on cases. Maximizing value while minimizing cost sounds like a core function of a good GC.