Related Posts
More Posts
Hannah Anne is the clear winner
Additional Posts in Engineering
What you didn't know about engineering...
What's a guilty pleasure you indulge in at work?
Engineering influencers to follow?
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.



Double-checking is always good practice, although not everyone does it
I agree that it should be required. But, in practice it doesn't always happen. To be honest, I'm sometimes shocked at how error ridden some things are that come across my desk. Not to mention poorly written. If I can't get someone to proofread something for me, what I'll try to do is put it aside for a day or two if possible. And just by looking at it anew I may find things that need to be changed or corrected.
Having a second pair of eyes on something can be really helpful! We regularly ask each other for a second glance on 3D designs we make, but usually only ask for a read through of emails going to clients/wya higher ups.
It really depends on how important the work is. If these are just standard correspondence and you're relatively new to the job or industry - then no, you shouldn't need for someone else to read over your work. Though do use spellcheck or a grammar program to catch mistakes. Definitely re-read your own work and writings. It is not common for other people to check your work for standard work.
For larger projects or more important correspondence - especially to clients, a second set of eyes seems reasonable.
Tip: When re-reading your own work - make sure to actually read it and don't just glance over it. We so often read what we think we wrote and not what we actually wrote.