Related Posts
Why is Deloitte’s 401k match do anemic?
More Posts
Conversation Starter
This post for relatives thinking 😂
Bowl Leader
Additional Posts in Strategy & Planning
How are salaries in Montreal for planners?
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Well the billionaires have tricked the hundredaires into believing the hundredthousandaires are the problem sooo…
It shouldn’t be at all but the unfortunate reality is that we live in a greedy money hungry society that only cares about hoarding money and doing so by any means (thievery, enslavement, dishonesty, murder, etc.
100%!
While I’m not sure a fresh 22 year old graduate deserves this, it sounds nice for a mid career person who doesn’t aspire to an executive role.
Yup agree 100%
At the risk of upsetting your favorite TikTok’s law of attraction guru….We don’t get what we think we deserve. It’s a market thing. Sometimes is time to move jobs, sometimes it’s better to stay put. There will be a time to ask for remote work again. And “unlimited” time off. It’s a trap.
What we deserve and what we get, ah, there's something to contemplate on a cold winter's night. Some of what you're saying shouldn't be controversial. Though the remote work has become weirdly inflammatory, some of these old celebrity CEOs really get crazy over that. Go figure, you'd think they'd want us out of their sight, and instead it's the opposite.
Right? So true
Consider this: If relying on business owners and CEOs to provide these opportunities equally across the board is necessary, why not create them for yourself? The fact that you haven’t taken that step highlights the same challenges that make the model you’re proposing ineffective.
In many cases, business owners and top executives have put everything on the line—risking their time, money, and security—to build what they have. Their success comes from sacrifice, perseverance, and making difficult decisions. Now, imagine a system where those who haven’t taken on that level of risk are entitled to the same rewards. Would that be fair? Would it create an environment where leadership thrives, or one where decision-making stalls, resentment grows, and opportunities for advancement are stifled?
A model based solely on workforce equality, without recognizing individual effort and risk, could ultimately lead to a stagnant system—one where no one takes responsibility, jealousy replaces ambition, and growth beyond a current role becomes nearly impossible.
Not controversial but does overly simplify something as complex as the economy and many market forces that influence employment opportunities.