Anyone know what the benefits are like at DDBNY?
Related Posts
Tata Consultancy Infosys Cognizant Wipro I have completed all the technical and HR rounds and salary discussion, documents submission also done. But all of sudden got mail from hr saying that my profile is kept on hold. Any possibility that I will receive offer letter or it will be in hold forever? Meantime can I attend interview for other positions in hcl?
Any word on Swift in Portland?
Notice period in jpmc is 1 month or 2 months?
More Posts
Jummah Mubarak Fam ☪️💚
What is tech consulting hike ? For staf 3 senior
Bowl Leader
Conversation Starter
90s music binge is so fire right now.
Additional Posts in Advertising
The new Volvo commercials are 🔥🔥🔥
Any word on Swift in Portland?
Is the emperor wearing any clothes?
How to define a good creative director?
Who’s hiring Art Directors in Chicago?
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
They long had a reputation as being a toxic workplace, then they were suedby an HIV positive gay CD who alleged discrimination and abuse. omnicom ended up settling our of court, which is tantamount to an admission of guilt. Holding Companies don't do that if there is any realistic chance of them getting out of it.
Adweek story following the settlement here:
******
Omncom Reaches Settlement in Anti-Gay Discrimination Case
DDB creative director alleged haraasmenr
By Patrick Coffee
|
January 5, 2018

Former DDB creative director Matt Christiansen, the plaintiff, and his lawyer, Susan Chana Lask, reached a settlement with the agency.
Susan Chana Lask
After more than two and a half years of legal developments, holding company Omnicom has reached a settlement in a discrimination suit brought by a now-former employee of its agency DDB.
The case went through a series of dramatic turns, including a dismissal by a U.S. District Court Judge in 2016, before the plaintiff successfully appealed earlier this year. It also served as a study in whether matters of sexual stereotyping may be applied to sexual orientation.
Conditions of the settlement have not been made public.
In May 2015, lawyer Susan Chana Lask, Esq. filed a civil complaint in the Southern District Court of New York seeking $20 million in damages on behalf of her client, DDB creative director Matthew Christiansen, for “discrimination, harassment and victimization … because of an HIV disability,” as stated in the complaint. She claimed violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which protects employees against discrimination based on sex, race, nationality or religion.
The defendants named in the case were Omnicom; DDB New York; that agency’s former chief digital officer Joe Cianciotto; its current CEO, Chris Brown; and its former CEO Peter Hempel.
This week, a holding company representative confirmed the settlement, writing, “the matter has been resolved amicably, and Matt is not returning to the agency.”
“Since I obtained the positive Second Circuit concurring decision now clarifying sexual orientation discrimination under Title VII, I then settled this matter amicably for all of the parties,” attorney Lask told Adweek. “Matt has happily moved on in his career, with the best wishes of all involved.”
Both parties declined to elaborate further.
Adweek reached out to Cianciotto on social media but has yet to receive a response. Davis & Gilbert and Leeds Brown Law, the law firms that represented Omnicom and Cianciotto, respectively, have not responded to emails seeking comment.
Allegations of harassment
In the initial filing, Christiansen, who was identified only as “Anonymous,” claimed that he had been “emotionally and physically paralyzed with fear as a gay man being discriminated by his own supervisor” while working under Cianciotto. According to that document, the other current and former DDB executives named in the case failed to act to prevent this behavior despite receiving complaints from Christiansen and other employees.
“The alleged conduct in this complaint occurred years ago and the employee who filed the lawsuit did not previously file a complaint with DDB about any of the actions cited,” an agency representative told Adweek the month after the case was filed in 2015. “We do not believe the lawsuit has merit and we will defend ourselves vigorously.”
Lask later provided Adweek with a statement calling those claims “inaccurate” before publishing a LinkedIn post that named her client and publicly detailed the allegations in the suit. That post claimed that Cianciotto “commenced a harassment campaign against [Christiansen] by repeatedly accusing Matthew of having AIDS just because he was gay” as soon as he joined DDB in 2011.
More specifically, Lask wrote that her client’s manager had referred to him as “super gay” and told another gay employee, “He sleeps with everyone. He must have HIV, right?” The post alleged that Cianciotto created drawings of “gay employees fornicating” in the agency’s New York office and included an image of another drawing, also allegedly created by Cianciotto, that depicted Christiansen “defecating, urinating and with an erect penis with comments on gay equality.”
The post went on to claim that Cianciotto had “accused [Christiansen] of having AIDS” during a meeting between colleagues and representatives of DDB client State Farm.
Christiansen was HIV-positive but did not have AIDS, according to his attorney’s initial filing.
Lask’s LinkedIn post, which went live in June 2015, also claimed that Christiansen and other employees complained to leadership, and that leadership “defended Joe [Cianciotto] and would threaten them.” In response to that claim, an agency spokesperson told Adweek, “The plaintiff in this action remains employed by DDB and has never been asked to leave the agency nor threatened with litigation by DDB.”
A new twist in the case
In early 2016, the case was closed after a U.S. district judge approved the defendants’ motion to dismiss, finding that the protections of Title VII do not apply to sexual orientation or gender identity.
In her ruling, as reported by Gay City News, Judge Katherine Polk Failla “reluctantly” wrote that Christiansen and Lask had not demonstrated a violation of the Civil Rights Act despite the fact that Cianciotto was “openly resentful and hostile toward Plaintiff because of his sexual orientation.”
The plaintiff appealed, and nearly one year later, chief judge Robert A. Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York ruled in his favor. In that decision, Katzmann cited the 1989 case of Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, which concerned executives at the professional services network who allegedly told a female senior manager that she needed to “walk more femininely, talk more femininely, dress more femininely, wear make-up, have her hair styled and wear jewelry” if she wanted to become a partner.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against PwC in that case, and judge Katzmann’s ruling overturning the earlier dismissal cited the decision, noting: “We disagree with the district court’s conclusion that Christiansen failed to plausibly allege a Title VII claim based on the … stereotyping theory of sex discrimination articulated in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins.”
Katzmann wrote, “The gender stereotyping allegations in Christiansen’s complaint are cognizable under Price Waterhouse and our precedents,” implying that the earlier case had conclusively established discrimination related to gender identity and sexual orientation as a potential violation of Title VII.
In March 2017, an Omnicom representative responded, “While we believe the claims in this individual case are without merit, Omnicom supports any change to the applicable federal law that would extend protection to employees who experience harassment on the basis of sexual orientation.”
Wow. This FB post asking about benefits took a turn I didn’t see coming!
Exactly like all the other holding companies?
Supposedly they cleaned up their act after that $20 million anti harassment suit that was brought against them a couple of years ago. so there's that.
What was the harassment suit about?
Yeah what was the harassment suit? Sounds interesting.
The harrssmemt suit was a blow for them. You can only hope they course corrected afterwards.
Health care? 401k employer matching? PTO/sick days/personal days? Cell phone coverage?
No matching. Meh healthcare (80% covered by blue cross blue shield after deductible). Had 15 PTO days and 5 sick days. Cell phone depends on level, mine was $60.
Oh, and senior leadership is atrocious. The good creatives left are planning to run and strategy is horrendous.
Ari doesn’t seem to care.
Thank you Consultant1. This is the kind of stuff that must keep holding companies up at night.