Related Posts
TBWA NY layoffs today.
I was in the final stages of an interview with Microsoft two weeks ago, in partner marketing. Then the recruiter told me they were putting the hiring process on hold to assess the need for the role. Well, then we heard about Microsoft layoffs last week. Seems like most were in Xbox and Project Alpha but there’s not a lot of information out there. Should I hold out any hope that I’m going to get this job? Any insights on how much these layoffs have impacted the marketing org and/or new hiring?
History of BCG layoffs anyone?
More Posts
Any good dad jokes?
Additional Posts in Engineering
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.



Unless the 40-year veteran has some major performance or attitude problems, I’m laying off the new hire. Experience matters.
I'm sure the correct corporate answer would be to lay off the veteran with all the tribal knowledge, because the organization will get more work out of the younger person. But I would resist that and keep the older person. I know that in America of 2024 loyalty is an outmoded concept, but I'll stick with it.
Unless the brand new employee is a rockstar (rare, but I have seen it happen), I would keep the veteran with experience. Those people are usually worth their weight in gold.
Honestly, I would ignore how long either of them had been with the company entirely and instead only choose to focus on what each one of them brings to the table, and which has the most potential to be more productive and beneficial to the company.
Rising Star
Most likely the new guy. Being the new guy and there is talk of my company doing layoffs, I'm a little nervous.
Depends
Rising Star
For me, it would depend on how much value they hold now and in the future. Are they helpful? Are they eager to learn? Do they meld well with the team? I've worked with 40+ year employees who are amazing, helpful, and a valuable asset. I've also worked with 40+ year employees who contribute very little. The answer is not always straightforward.