Related Posts
Hello,
I had my interview with Infosys for .net full stack developer.
It went well and i am hoping for a positive response.
Want to know how much should I expect Or at what pkg should I negotiate with them.
I am thinking of proposing 13-15 LPA negotiable.
4 YOE and 7 LPA currently
.Net full stack
Infosys
How do you break the habit of procrastination?
Which company is good to join in terms of WLB, stability and future growth.
L&T financials : 17.5 F + 2.5+ Variable+3Lac J
Citiustech : 22LPA
T SYSTEMS : 23 LPA
Synechron : 22.5 F + 1 Lac Variable+1Lac JB
Luxoft LLP : 25LPA
please help to clear my mind? also there is scope for negotiations to match the CTC with the above companies. YOE - 6.2, Java springbootLuxoft Synechron Inc. CitiusTech T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd.
Is HARMAN really recruiting for permanent remote roles? Would they ask us to come to office after sometime? I am a bachelor woman supporting my sickly parents and can't move them out of city. And my city don't have harman office. HR did mention permanent remote, still want to confirm as I've heard many cases people were called back across different product based companies. Tata Consultancy IBM Infosys @HARMAN IBM Accenture Cognizant
Where can I buy big four swag?
Additional Posts in Human Resources
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.



If you are frustrated with performance ratings, it’s not the ratings you are frustrated with, it’s the communication about the philosophy of them.
Before each appraisal process there should be meetings for supervisors and meetings for line staff, explaining the process, what each persons role is, and what ratings mean.
To ensure consistency there should be meetings to ensure ratings are applied appropriately. For example, all employees can’t be an A. Ratings, to some degree need to follow a bell type of curve, because for ratings to be meaningful, they have to allow for variance between individual performance.
Ratings should be based on predetermined criteria, that was shared with the employee before the rating cycle begins. Managers should give frequent feedback during the course of the year so that there are no surprises at rating time. At the same time, employees should not only do a self appraisal at rating time, but they should ensure that they are getting regular feedback. Maybe send a regular update to their manager highlighting successes and challenges. Fact is when the appraisal comes out and the employee is surprised by the rating, it means year long feedback was ineffective.
Can’t promise you’ll always agree with your rating, but with context it’s easier to understand and to know what is needed to score higher
Fair enough!
I would replace them with more regular feedback. I have seen annual ratings create stress and bias. Ongoing conversations feel more useful and honest.
Agree with this for sure!