Related Posts
I'm looking to find a job like the Forward Deployed Engineer role Palantir Technologies in the UK.
I have become hooked on finding a job that involves solving the kinds of problems they presented during their interviews. Although I got to the final round my performance anxiety got the better of me (I think I wanted the job a bit too much...). I will reapply after working in a similar company.
Is it "deep tech" / "data science" or "smart enterprise" that they're doing? Any advice welcome.
A *multi national bank* is hiring for the role of customer service representatives
Requisites:
Any graduation.
Must be able to speak English fluently.
Flexible with shifts.
Experience: Even fresher may apply.
Salary best in the class.
If you possess the required skills & experience please forward your resume to:
m2thimmaiah@gmail.com
More Posts
Any news from DPW? 🤔🤔
Proud to be at uncle D
For those of us up struggling.. we got this!

Additional Posts in LinkedIn Cringe
And now.. let me take a selfie!

crying ceo killed everyone today on LinkedIn 🤣🤣🤣

Thought I was on LinkedIn when I saw this one

It's the "loves this" for me

Like, I dunno man, you okay...?

$1000 says this didn’t happen. 🤣 😂

New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.















OP - agreed. As job seekers we lack enthusiasm and all of that other nonsense because we know that it’s a dog and pony show. The reality is that we are interviewing for the job because we need a paycheck and benefits!
And might I add, we can do all of the things listed in the pic and STILL get ghosted or declined.
Having worked in both the recruitment industry and employed many people, and conducted 100s of interviews, sadly the points made are valid.
I’ve been lucky. 3 companies round 4 & 5 with interviews. We shall see.
So bad. I like how it doesn’t mention the fact that companies interview 20+ people for each one role.
Enthusiast
Right! 95% of the applicants don't make it to the second round because there's only one position. The poster wrote that post to make herself feel good, not to help people land new roles.
Pro
#4 is so dumb. Why would a candidate be there if they didn’t want that job?
Let's be real here. Some people just need money it it's what available. Not everyone has a love for the job they love, sadly.
Aka the candidate didn’t shuck and jive and kiss butt to show that they want the job. As a recruiter all I need to know and assess from someone is do they meet the requirements and criteria first on paper, then assess through meeting them, are they capable of carrying the tasks out required of the job? Are they professional? Is this person reliable, respectful of others? All that extra stuff is fluff. And I can’t stand when orgs ask “why do you want to work here?” The obvious, you’re hiring and I need a job.
Agreed! This was so eloquently said!
And there’s the other perspective that the candidate is also interviewing the company.
Enthusiast
THIS!!!!! Interviewers also have an obligation to make the candidate want to work with them, it’s a two way street
Agreed. 95% of people do one of those things? It’s laughable. I’d love to see her interview.
Rising Star
These are literally the basic components of being a good candidate...
Exactly i don't get the hate here, it's professional chemistry. Unless you're showcasing your talent somehow, how is the interviewer expected to rate you as a candidate? We're not psychics, so yes relating to the opposite person is a basic thing. Don't get me wrong , you'll know if you're vibing or not. I don't want to pull the generation card, but we all know which one likely has an issue with such common sense tips.
Enthusiast
This individual's LinkedIn post is not helpful. The argument oversimplifies the hiring decision process and is based on the assumption that the poster is a competent interviewer. Also, the poster is laboring under the cognitive bias called functional attribution error. The individual is overemphasizing the role of the applicant's personal characteristics or actions (e.g., not connecting with the interviewer, not showing enthusiasm) while underestimating the influence of situational or external factors (e.g., the applicant's qualifications, the job market, or the interviewer's own biases).
I don’t understand the call out for HR opinions at the end but none of this is really very controversial stuff. “Be good at interviewing” is not toxic advice for job candidates.