Related Posts
More Posts
Additional Posts in Personal Injury Lawyers
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

I don’t have experience in multiple states, so I can’t compare, but I know that California has no cap on pain and suffering (except for medmal). If you are able to also do employment litigation, it’s a goldmine from what I hear (very demanding restrictions on employers).
If I were starting in PI in California, I would do nursing home medial malpractice and then more into other fields. It would be a great step off but not just plaintiff. I would do both sides and working with insurance companies
CA for the pure comparative fault rule (even if you’re 99% at fault, you can still recover for the 1% of fault from the other person) & no cap on pain and suffering. Only downside to CA PI is for car accidents, the state minimum policy is 15k (in rare cases, 10k), and a shockingly high amount of people carry minimum policy. You’re also going to have *a lot* of competition for business, but honestly, there’s plenty to go around for everyone.
Pi for medical malpractice is different and specially for wrongful death. Pi is not just car accidents.