Related Posts
How do you set boundaries at work?
More Posts
And now.. let me take a selfie!

Hello fishes,
I have 8.5 year .net full stack+azure. I am having below offers
1. honeywell - 24lpa fix - advance software engineer
2. Kpmg global - 25 lpa fix +1jb -assistant manager 3. Pearson education - 27.5 lpa ( 25 fix +2.5 variable) - .net specialist
4. Smc squared 26 lpa fix + 1jb - technical lead
5. Schneider electric ( in pipeline) for staff engineer
Which ones to choose according to wlb, job security and new learning
Honeywell KPMG Schneider Electric
Additional Posts in Leadership
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.





A leader shouldn’t be expected to know everything. I have a technical background but moved into business leadership roles almost a decade ago. I still have a solid technical foundation, but there’s no way I can be a business leader and know everything technically inside out. So I need the SMEs in my team to be smarter than me, to have more knowledge than me, and it’s my role as a leader to give them the space to shine - to grow and develop and be able to use their knowledge to its fullest potential. If they succeed, then I succeed.
Leaders aren’t meant to be all knowing all doing all skilled beings, that’s impossible. Which is the purpose behind the premise of being comfortable hiring people “smarter than you.” Which doesn’t mean hire someone that could do your job better than you, it means hire the best person for the job you’re hiring for and that means they SHOULD be able to do that job better than you, bc they’re the expert in that role. & don’t let someone’s expert ability to do their job intimidate you or make u feel imposter syndrome in your role based on your lack of proficiency in THEIR role. I’m meant to be the expert in my role, which is a totally different role from my teams and therefore doesn’t mean I could do everybody else’s job, I’m not meant to and nor am I expected to. You don’t expect the ceo of a hospital, whose job is to run the business aspect of the hospital, to be able to care for a patient in the ER. You need to be able to differentiate roles in the matrix of the business. If your teams are reflecting some of those less than ideal attitudes “my boss couldn’t even do my job,” then that’s a problem with their perspective and understanding of role differentiation and expectations, which I would consider addressing. But don’t let that affect you bc there will always be those types of attitudes here and there, it only reflects on their lack not yours.
I wouldn't see hiring a smart person to be undermining. If anything, it should show a commitment to getting the best work done. But, having said that, I think many managers in actuality don't want smart people around. They're insecure and afraid of being outclassed. Or of losing their own job to the smart person.
Intelligence <> leadership
A successful leader is one who surrounds himself with successful employees. For example, Bear Bryant didn't take the field to play quarterback, runningback, linebacker, etc. He is regarded as one of the best coaches in college football because he was able to inspire good athletes to become great athletes. No need to feel like an imposter just because you have a wunderkind on staff that makes the numbers sing. Your job is to encourage the employees to be better than they think they can be. Now, if one of these smarty pants makes the mistake of pointing out that they are better at their job than you could ever be, you can show them how good you are at firing employees who are disrespectful of authority.
Or herself…
If you are better than your team, you may be failing as a manager
“If you’re the smartest person in the room, you’re in the wrong room”