Related Posts
Hii Guys, Could anyone give me some clarity on the below point. I have cleared 2nd round of technical interview at Deloitte, but my candidature is still showing as interview in progress at Deloitte careers page. I had a discussion with HR on this and she told me that next process is pending from management side. It's been almost 10 days since from 2 nd round of interview. How much more time does it gonna take, any idea? Or is it normal. Please help me with this 🙏🙏 .Deloitte
Currently a Solutions Consultant at Pegasystems.
I am interviewing at and considering making a jump to Oracle as a Specialist Solutions Consultant.
The reason for my move is currently at Pega SCs are treated more as AEs or Account Managers. The role at Oracle would be more of a true SC position. I also feel that Oracle will look BETTER on a resume and someone as young as me would have BETTER programs in place to train me and give me the foundation needed to be a successful SC.
Thoughts?
Oracle
More Posts
Can anyone share what its like at Anomaly?
Does HCL run BGV on UAN?
Any Punjabi guys here? 26F, west coast
Additional Posts in Consulting
Pro
Best books on leadership and sales skills?
Is M&A integration good work?
CAIA vs CFA?
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Wow - some of these responses are bizarre.
I've done Federal work for 25+ years and ALWAYS post the name of the Agency or Department I've worked for on my resume or LinkedIn as well as the work because everyone RECRUITS based not only on your track record and skill set, but what kind of network you've built.
My biggest repeat clients are DS/DSS inside of DoS, a bunch of parts of Commerce with three turns at NOAA and probably every CoCOM DoD has (sorry, won't EVER refer to them as DoW) as well as a bunch of other DoD components. Most parts of DoJ and DHS with most prominent being three projects inside USCG in the past dozen years.
I even post the AGENCY or DEPT logos on my LinkedIn profile, not the prime or sub I worked for because (AGAIN) people are interested in who you have worked with and the connections your have in the shop
Unless you have been signed to something that EXPLICITLY says you CANNOT say who your terminal client is (e.g. you just say "BAH" not BAH + say, USDA then there is no reason to leave off the name of the client or not discuss them by name in an interview - especially if you aren't working on the high side on anything considered "sensitive"
My projects have gotten national news coverage so since all my work is easily "discoverable" and in the public domain I don't know why anyone would say that it's the normal standard to NOT talk about who you worked with, via whatever consultancy you were retained by
Unless they approved you disclosing, no. There are confidentiality clauses you would have signed as an employee and that would also have been in the contracts between the company and the relevant agency.
In consulting work, the best approach is: Don’t disclose the client’s name without their permission. You can provide a vague description of the client and provide generic description of the work you did.
EXAMPLE: At an office within the broad DOD umbrella, I analyzed and provided solutions to complex architecture challenges.
Because DoD is a huge organization, you can mention them without giving a clue who you really worked for and describing “complex challenges “ you make it sound like difficult work but you don’t give specifics.
Chief
If it’s not cleared work, you are free to list the client but not the work itself. I work in classified spaces and all the resumes I see list the client, high level work and what level of existing clearance they have.