Related Posts
More Posts
To the moon WSB! 🦍🚀💎🤣

Bain & Company Hi All, Have YOE - 13 in Supply Chain Planning domain. Holding current offer 37.5L fixed + 8L Variable. Looking for better offer. Refer if any openings in your organization. Currently in notice period. Thanks. Deloitte Micron Technology IBM Consulting Bain & Company McKinsey & Company British Telecom Bristlecone Blume global Blue Yonder Infosys Intel Corporation VMware KPMG Pwc AC EY-Parthenon EY Kimberly-Clark
Favorite quotes from Office Space? And go!
Wanted to highlight a cool thing — denveradschool.com/bcm
Proud to have the help of Cactus, CPB, Fact & Fiction, Fortnight Collective, Karsh Hagan, LRXD, Madwell, Motive, TDA, and Vladimir Jones.
We’ve already had 8 applications in two weeks and with the help of these 10 agencies we’re taking a big step towards getting more Black talent hired at Colorado agencies.
We’ve got more initiatives to come, but this was a big one for us. What is your agency doing to help? Share below!
LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech is Hiring.....!!!!
DATA - Virtual Weekend drive for Women Professionals ..!!!
Virtual drive on 17th Sept 2022...!!!
Need immediate joiners preferred within 30 days.....!!!!!
Grab this opportunity.....!!!!
If anyone interested for below jobs opportunity, Please DM me or share your resume to lti.referraldrive@gmail.com.
Locations: Mumbai / Pune / Chennai / Coimbatore / Kolkata

Additional Posts in Big Law
Come on Cravath, do better for all Classes!

Leaving after one year to another biglaw firm?
How are hours at Simpson Thacher LA?
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.






Well
they’re f’d then
Yeah
But discriminating based on race for any job title, even as lowly as associate, is illegal. They don’t have to max out on illegality across all titles to violate federal civil rights laws.
“Six firms who also received the EEOC letter— Kirkland & Ellis, Latham & Watkins, Simpson Thacher, A&O Shearman, Skadden, and Milbank— made deals with Trump that included free legal services, in exchange for being released from the probe”
Was this a meaningful reason why some firms cut the deals? To not submit identifiable data about their lawyers?
Interesting, thanks! So merging A2 and A4 comments..
The EEOC asked for recruiting, promo, staffing, performance review materials from those 6 law firms - and all the clients of those law firms?
Was it just asking for the client info where those firms supported employment law work, so the clients documents were already in the law firm IT records?
Or were the law firms supposed to reach out to their non-employment law clients to get copies of that information?
Thanks!
Yes it would have been awful to have to share that client information. I am amazed Goodwin have done this rather than just agree to the token pro bono requirement.
Yep, one of the questions is “Since 2019, fully identify all clients that have “diversity requirements” or “diversity preferences”…”
I didn’t see any client info requested in the EEOC complaints, except maybe whether clients were asking the firms to have teams with racial quotas like Coca-Cola. If seemed like everything was about internal firm info regarding hiring and promotions.
Yeah, demographics of the proposed team and other related questions are in most RFP pitches that I have seen. Most public companies also have it for board composition.