Related Posts
More Posts
Who has seen the viral flying Tesla??🤣🤣🤣
Ross or Fuqua?
Who is hiring creatives right now???
Additional Posts in Litigation & Arbitration
Best big law firms for white collar defense?
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.




Sounds like a micro-manager tbh
“I am going to have to fix you, manage you two on a more personal scale, a more micro form of management.”
You’ll get more latitude as partners trust you more, and then you can use your own style. It’s annoying, but sometimes you just have to suck it up and do what they want (vomit). Unless partner is asking you to write/send something unethical or so out of bounds combative, let her spice up the emails.
I was like you when I started practicing employment law - thought it was better to be courteous and professional to all opposing counsel. Then, you slowly start to see that your professionalism and courtesy is nearly never reciprocated. You’ll notice which firms/attorneys are the a holes and tread accordingly.
Given all this, I start every case on a professional and courteous note (except with the a hole attorneys/firms I’ve dealt with before). Need an extension? Sure no problem. BUT, the second it’s taken for granted, I become your senior attorney.
She has become jaded. So have I. It is the unfortunate reality of employment litigation.
I use the same approach for commercial litigation. There are some attorneys who reciprocate professional courtesy, and it’s refreshing to litigate cases opposite those folks. But there are also many attorneys who are so unreasonable and dishonest that there is no point giving them an inch on anything.
Same thing happens to me alllll the time. I don’t have to run every correspondence by her but she does call the shots, and she instructs me to be way more aggressive/follow up way quicker/file motions immediately without giving OC time to fix/etc. I don’t want to develop a reputation that isn’t really mine. That said, I comfort myself with 1) she has way more experience than I do and probably has seen what happens with specific opposing counsel if you aren’t aggressive and 2) if people really thought about it they’d know I, the first year attorney, am not calling the shots on my own..
As long as you can bill that asking time…
In the (admittedly very little) time I spent doing employment law, it was also my experience that the attorneys were all combative to each other right out of the gate. Even if I consciously tried to establish a good rapport with opposing counsel, I’d almost always get aggression in response. That litigation style didn’t resonate with me, and is one of the many reasons I concentrate elsewhere now. So anecdotally it may be a practice area issue and not a boss issue.
That’s a good point and along with the other posts on here, I think you’re probably right. I don’t think this practice area is a good fit for me, unfortunately.
(professional across the board). But I have to run every email by her before I send it, and it gets vetoed if it’s not sufficiently snarky or aggressive enough. It’s just weird for me. I am not a new attorney, but new to employment law. Is this just how it is?
It's how she operates, and you need to fall in line. Otherwise, it will be perceived as undermining her.
Yeah I get that
Perhaps the senior attorney has (bad) history with these opposing counsel such that she prefers to use this combative tone?
Are you usually plaintiff or defendants’ attorney? I’m wondering if that changes the tone of interactions.
Agree that it’s inappropriate to require that you always send your emails to her for pre-approval. A few times when you first start working together might be okay.