Related Posts
I am looking to identify committed Christians within Deloitte who would be interested in serving on the US board of a global non-profit committed to restoring the lives of those who have been traumatized via human trafficking or gender-based violence in SE Asia. Deloitte has been instrumental in partnering with Hagar International via pro-bono consulting and we would love to leverage this partnership on our US board.
More Posts
Do S& or EYP hire IOs?
Hello everyone. I have offers from below companies.
1. Accenture - 7.1 lpa + 21% variable
2. IBM - 7.26 fixed
3. Epsilon - 10.8 fixed
Have 3 yoe in QA. My point is will Accenture or IBM be able to match this offer ? Also want to know does ibm or Accenture blacklist if i don't join them?
Accenture IBM Epsilon
New feature 🤦

Adderall withdrawal ain't no joke

Additional Posts in Consulting
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.




Agree with BCG1, It's the present day politically correct BS That doesn't allow society to have a rational conversation on how to solve for real world problems, to include the real problem of gender diversity. Instead, its replaced with Google PR bull shit lip service so they can check the box for "doing something about diversity" but not actually change anything.
I read the memo and I think it's laced with bigotry and prejudice. Like if a catholic priest talked about how little boys are molested because of how cute they are or some farcical reason, so we should have a real conversation and stop blaming the priests who molested them.
I agree with you. The firing is silly. Better to discuss disagreements or viewpoints them just firing the dude. Google could have handled the situation in a more democratic way. Unless he was mistreating people. Perhaps we don't know all the facts.
If he were mistreating people such that it mandated his firing, the manifesto should be of no consequence. That is, it shouldn't take a manifesto to be the last straw. Highly doubt that's the case. By firing him, Google has just added more teeth to some of the expressions in his manifesto.
Hahaha bcg2 I'm going to agree with you there. I've had more open and honest conversations with all sorts of people sitting in the woods covered in mud and shitting in holes while in the Army then I'm able to have with people in this industry.
In consulting, always "one wrong move" away from being fired
I do agree that firing him was the wrong move; I'm surprised so many people are agreeing with these "facts." So many things contribute to study results and it's very easy to hear a study to show exactly what you want.
It is because of people like OP we have DJT as president today.
Where tf did this convo just go D3
Lol D3 first of all BLM is not racist...literally the exact opposite of racist
A2: Wanting to have segregation, making anti-white or anti-semantic statements, having opinions purely based on race etc etc are all racist things. BLM is just as racist as any of the 'white nationalist' groups that are complaining about white genocide.
Here is a little exercise for you. Go to their website and swap out black for white in their statements. When you do it sounds like something David Duke wrote.
D3 I see where you're trying to come from, but that view is largely due to media / nonsense reporting. The whole essence of the move@ent is that black lives matter just as much as everyone else. It's to bring awareness to the blatant racism and disrespect that black folks in our country experience on a daily basis; it's not meant to demean other races (although I know the movement is big and obviously some people will do that). It's just meant to bring black people up, not to tear down anyone else
Imagine if that neckbeard wrote his manifesto about specific minorities, like black people or Jews.
OP yes!!!! 👏👏👏👏
Many firms have already given him offers, including Wikileaks and Gab
D3, Professionals, especially ones with PhDs should have the social graces to be aware that posting something involving inherent genetic weaknesses will get your ass canned. Doesn't matter what the company is, if they let someone stay after that they're opening themselves up to hostile workplace lawsuits from many mag people
D3, you're really personally invested in this aren't you? The guy at google didn't publish a scientific paper, he published a rant that contained some scientific theory and a lot of anecdotes. Facts ARE facts but his "manifesto" went far beyond that. Imagine if any of us made a presentation in that manner
This thread is cancer.
EY1 I have only seen "unnamed engineer" in a few articles
😊
See this: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-08-08/google-can-t-seem-to-tolerate-diversity
His manifesto does not have the greatest reasoning, however, is he right to point out that an overt preference for one group over another is problematic?